Thoughts about sonic 06
#1
Posted 17 June 2012 - 04:59 AM
#2
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:02 AM
Sonic 06 is bad because it isn't what it could have been. Though that could be said about alot of games, the huge visibility of it in 06 is well...huge.
lol
#3
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:05 AM
Edited by Light_Framez, 17 June 2012 - 05:06 AM.
#4
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:06 AM
I've heard the fables. Pissy Microsoft, rush to launch, etc.Ineresting, did anyone tell you the story about why sonc 06 failed?
#5
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:10 AM
It's just...there is seriously nothing good here. And it was supposed to be a celebration for the series.
#6
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:11 AM
If none of this happened. Sonic 06 would probably have been the best modern sonic game.
Edited by Light_Framez, 17 June 2012 - 05:14 AM.
#7
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:21 AM

POPULAR
No, it would still be shit. '06 has problems far deeper than just being a rush job.If none of this happened. Sonic 06 would probably have been the best modern sonic game.
#8
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:22 AM
When you say the worst of shovelware I'm lumping that with terrible party games, no it was still SOMEWHAT playable and the music was great. And on a side note, Black Knight gets alot of flack, but it did a TON of things right, for starters it handled multiple playable characters well, of course the music was on point, it fixed the control scheme of Secret Rings (while also in the process adding a few problems in regards to the responsiveness in the swordplay) to where you can actually use the control stick, the voice acting wasn't COMPLETE garbage, and there was alot fanservice with the art and such.Utterly abysmal. The only games that can compete with it as far as being terrible are the worst of the shovelware, but weighting them by their relevance to the series it's easily the worst (and considering games like ShtH and SatBK, that's no easy feat).
It's just...there is seriously nothing good here. And it was supposed to be a celebration for the series.
Edited by Dr.SuperJXJ, 17 June 2012 - 05:23 AM.
#9
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:24 AM
On the other hand, a fucking sword.And on a side note, Black Knight gets alot of flack, but it did a TON of things right,
#10
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:24 AM
And what problems would those be that couldn't have been weeded out during extra developement time?No, it would still be shit. '06 has problems far deeper than just being a rush job.
#11
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:26 AM
Not finishing the game in time is no excuse. The game was far from being half-finished, and Sonic fans knew about it well before a year that it came out. I'm sure it had plenty of development even before then.
And what problems would those be that couldn't have been weeded out during extra developement time?
Would you like your birthday present a year and a half after your birthday?
Edited by UltDevilDoom, 17 June 2012 - 05:25 AM.
#12
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:33 AM
You seem to dislike EVERY gimmick, so with all due respect I take that with a pint of piss unless you can telly me why just the mere fact of Sonic having a sword in a non-mainstream title is so awful. Again, it's all about the execution and how well the gimmick is utilized, not just its mere existence and being there. *looks at Super Mario Sunshine's FLUDD and how well that did*On the other hand, a fucking sword.
EDIT: (Hope I'm not coming across too strong here, I really mean no disrespect)
I don't fully understand this analogy or its relevency D:Would you like your birthday present a year and a half after your birthday?
Call me slow but I really don't know how to respond lol
Edited by Dr.SuperJXJ, 17 June 2012 - 05:28 AM.
#13
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:37 AM
But you don't know that do you? All of you guys need to focus on what sonic 06 could've done well or what it already did well.No, it would still be shit. '06 has problems far deeper than just being a rush job.
It did have alot of shit going on. but there were "some" good things. which shows that Sega was on the right track.
Edited by Light_Framez, 17 June 2012 - 05:40 AM.
#14
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:37 AM
All of you guys need to focus on what sonic 06 could've done well or what it already did well.
I can assume that the music was at least one good thing the game did well and most would agree.
Edited by Major Ziggy, 17 June 2012 - 05:39 AM.
#15
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:38 AM

POPULAR
The writing, the art style, the poor voice acting, the heavy focus on alternate gameplay, the mach speed areas, the heavily automated stage design...And what problems would those be that couldn't have been weeded out during extra developement time?
Because it puts an excessive focus on combat in a game that is primarily a platformer, and should be about moving fluidly rather than hacking and slashing through hordes of generic enemies. It's also an incredibly poor fit for a character that has always gotten by on his natural abilities and who can already saw through metal with his own body.You seem to dislike EVERY gimmick, so with all due respect I take that with a pint of piss unless you can telly me why just the mere fact of Sonic having a sword in a non-mainstream title is so awful.
Actually sometimes it is about the gimmick's existence. No amount of good implementation can save a terrible, unfitting gimmick.Again, it's all about the execution and how well the gimmick is utilized, not just its mere existence and being there.
e:
Literally nothing.All of you guys need to focus on what sonic 06 could've done well or what it already did well.
Seriously.
Name one thing '06 did or could reasonably have done that would be worth doing.
e2:
I don't even think the music's that great. It isn't bad, but aside from a small handful of tracks I don't find it to be memorable or particularly enjoyable. Most other Sonic games have far better soundtracks.I can assume that the music was at least one good thing the game did well and most would agree.
Edited by Diogenes, 17 June 2012 - 05:47 AM.
#16
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:51 AM
Music.
Characters had something unique about them, some were clones (knuckles&rogue etc), but it still worked. im someone who doesn't want to play a sonic game with the same formula WITH the same character in every game.
character design. where everyone got there first HD modern look.
There you go.
Edited by Light_Framez, 17 June 2012 - 05:53 AM.
#17
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:57 AM

POPULAR
No, not really. And any quality in a technical sense is ruined by its bland "realistic" art style and terrible character designs.For a game that came out in 06 . the graphics looks ok.
Is not that great.Music.
Then why the fuck do you follow a series? They had already spent way too much time making gameplay that has no business being in a Sonic game before '06 came about.Characters had something unique about them, some were clones (knuckles&rogue etc), but it still worked. im someone who doesn't want to play a sonic game with the same formula WITH the same character in every game.
You mean being fuck-ugly? Because the characters are fuck-ugly.character design. where everyone got there first HD modern look.
#18
Posted 17 June 2012 - 06:01 AM
I follow it because i believe sega can do a fucking better job at making games for him. problem?No, not really. And any quality in a technical sense is ruined by its bland "realistic" art style and terrible character designs.
Is not that great.
Then why the fuck do you follow a series? They had already spent way too much time making gameplay that has no business being in a Sonic game before '06 came about.
You mean being fuck-ugly? Because the characters are fuck-ugly.
Reason why sega had there minds tied in knotes was because of the fans themselves. telling sega to do this and that like they own them. which is why there games arent as good anymore.
#19
Posted 17 June 2012 - 06:08 AM
When you praise the games for doing random shit because you're too ADHD-addled to enjoy one kind of gameplay, yeah. If you want something different from each game, buy different kinds of games. Don't encourage Sonic Team to insert whatever random shit seems popular to pad their games.I follow it because i believe sega can do a fucking better job at making games for him. problem?
First off, this is a fucking joke considering you want alternate gameplay styles, since you're just encouraging them to flit from one random idea to another. Second, the fans started complaining in earnest after Sonic Team started fucking up, not before. And please, don't treat a company as if they're some bullied child; if they can't get their shit together and pick out the good complaints from the bad, that's just one more reason to criticize them.Reason why sega had there minds tied in knotes was because of the fans themselves. telling sega to do this and that like they own them. which is why there games arent as good anymore.
Edited by ^DiZnEy^, 17 June 2012 - 02:17 PM.
#20
Posted 17 June 2012 - 06:15 AM
Or.
Everybody could simmer down because it's just a freaking video game? Or is that too much to ask?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



This topic is locked










