

What does this all mean? I don't know. But if Valve is injecting one of their biggest hits with some sort of alternative reality game, something's certainly up.
Edited by SuperStingray, 02 March 2010 - 02:15 AM.
Posted 02 March 2010 - 02:14 AM


Edited by SuperStingray, 02 March 2010 - 02:15 AM.
Posted 02 March 2010 - 02:25 AM
Posted 02 March 2010 - 02:33 AM
Posted 02 March 2010 - 03:33 AM

Really? Damn, when did they say that?Oh god damn, I know neither Half-Life 2: Episode 3 nor Portal 2 will be released this year,
Posted 02 March 2010 - 04:59 AM
Posted 02 March 2010 - 05:28 AM

Posted 02 March 2010 - 05:38 AM
Posted 02 March 2010 - 06:28 AM
Posted 02 March 2010 - 06:54 AM


Posted 02 March 2010 - 07:12 AM
Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:38 AM

So let me see if I have this straight:
Valve does a stealth update to portal with patch notes mentioning something about transmissions. There are now radios throughout the game that, when taken past certain points, send out a transmission containing morse code messages, which appear to involve usernames and passwords etc.
In addition, the sound files contain embedded images including numbers that make up an md5 sum, which resolves to a phone number that connects to a "GlaDOS" BBS which asks for a username and password. when you put in "backup" for both, the thing goes crazy with garbled text from "C. Johnson" from Aperture Science and some old school ANSI images of portal and possibly half-life related business.
Is that about right?
Oh and the GlaDOS version from the BBS is 3.11 which possibly corresponds to announcement Valve could make at GDC on March 11. Anything else?
Posted 02 March 2010 - 12:29 PM
Really? Damn, when did they say that?
d. Seniors
Frail, brittle hands make holding science devices difficult. Most were born
before the advent of science, and can become confused and disoriented when
asked to participate in relatively simple tests (teleportation, invisibility,
adjusting esteem levels of orphan children).
Posted 02 March 2010 - 01:19 PM
"The Borealis is an Aperture Science research vessel introduced in Half-Life 2: Episode Two. According to Isaac Kleiner, Aperture was working on a promising project, but in their rush to beat Black Mesa for funding, they neglected ordinary safety rules and it appears that the ship simply disappeared with parts of her dry dock, which earned her an almost legendary stature."
![]()
![]()
Posted 02 March 2010 - 01:27 PM
Posted 02 March 2010 - 02:08 PM
Anyways, how do you GET the images exactly? Hell, where are these 26 radios? I remember seeing 3 or 4 the entire game.
Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:42 PM
If Aperture was experimenting with technology designed to render the Borealis invisible and that technology went awry and rendered parts of the ship's surrounding dry dock invisible too, that'd explain what happened to it, wouldn't it?
Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:54 PM
If you noticed, it was nowhere near the ocean, at least not where you would keep a boat like that. It was in the arctic somewhere.
Not to mention, you would FIGURE eventually someone would notice that there was an invisible ship where they tried to park their boat? Oh, and the crew of the ship would notice at least, invisibility would make it easy to find, and at it's mythical status, it was damn hard to find.
And what would the Combine want with invisibility?
Oh, and the 3 Tier program, that produced Aperture's ONLY truly successful products, had nothing on invisibility.
Posted 03 March 2010 - 06:43 AM
Posted 03 March 2010 - 09:13 PM
"[I] remind you that Aperture Science is built on three pillars. Pillar one: Science without results is just witchcraft. Pillar two: Get results or you're fired. Pillar three: if you suspect a coworker of bein' a witch, report them immediately. I cannot stress that enough. Witchcraft will not be tolerated."
"A lot of you have been raising concerns about the so-called "dangers" of what we're all doing here. The beancounters told me to tell you that as of today, testing will no longer be as mandatory or as dangerous. That's not gonna happen and here's the reason."
"Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: Why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: Why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired."
"Plus, in the event of your death, I personally guarantee that, thanks to the form you were required to sign this morning, your family will not suffer the indignities of a prolonged and costly legal battle against Aperture Science. Trust me, I am rich, and it is a burden I would not wish on anyone."
Edited by SuperStingray, 03 March 2010 - 09:15 PM.
Posted 03 March 2010 - 11:15 PM
* Added valuable asset retrieval
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users