Archie's Sonic the Hedgehog
#41
Posted 07 March 2009 - 03:48 PM
#42
Posted 07 March 2009 - 04:51 PM
I'm a "the video games are the only REAL Sonic!" kind of a fan.
Way to be closed-minded. Much like with SatAM, the comics didn't have much of a story to work with, since SEGA of America didn't feel that the Japanese style would appeal to American children, so we just got the basic "Robotnik turns Sonic's friends to robots and wants to rule Mobius" premise. Furthermore, the game plots aren't always brilliant, and I think it's foolish to think that they're perfect. Not trying to be rude, but really. Plus, the Adventure elements didn't come in until 1999; the cartoons and comics started in '93.
Sorry if this derails the topic, but I really hate when people say that kind of things. B|
As for Archie itself, I only really have read a few of the newer issues, and they kind of bug me. It's mainly the fact that they keep offing and introducing characters and, to me, it feels like they're focusing too much on fighting rather than plot and characterization.
#43
Posted 07 March 2009 - 05:03 PM
#44
Posted 07 March 2009 - 05:18 PM
I'd rather read about the characters fighting Eggman and other threats than see slumber parties and Sonic angstily wailing at the moon on his geetar.
Hahahah, I hear ya, I hear ya.
Mind you I take every universe into consideration in the Sonic series, and I believe that every universe is canon to a point in association to the games. Sega is even starting to accept other American-based canon. As for me, I do enjoy the Archie stories and SatAM storylines for providing an attempt at some solid depth to the ideas.
#45
Posted 07 March 2009 - 05:19 PM
Edited by Mega, 07 March 2009 - 05:20 PM.
#46
Posted 07 March 2009 - 07:21 PM
http://us.st12.yimg....cs_2044_6354699
http://us.st12.yimg....cs_2044_5422168
#47
Posted 07 March 2009 - 07:38 PM
#48
Posted 07 March 2009 - 07:41 PM
#49
Posted 07 March 2009 - 07:56 PM
#50
Posted 07 March 2009 - 08:13 PM
Not to start pairing debates or anything.
EDIT: I do wish that they would have been more creative with the kids, though. Their designs are so bland. :/
Edited by Mega, 07 March 2009 - 08:14 PM.
#51
Posted 07 March 2009 - 10:48 PM
I'm perfectly fine with the constant action. That's what goes on in the games, right? Unless you wanna read about Sonic running through loops and stuff.
Also, the book's called Sonic UNIVERSE. I'm glad things like the MXYL series are being kept there instead of the main issue. Plus, apparently that particular series is amazingly popular. Once again, it's a case of a very vocal minority of haters, against the silent majority of spenders. The latter always wins. Always.
#52
Posted 07 March 2009 - 11:25 PM
#53
Posted 07 March 2009 - 11:35 PM
#54
Posted 07 March 2009 - 11:48 PM
Hi there. Your rage is misguided. It's the FANS that you need to lose faith in, because Archie is only catering to them.but the second I saw #5 cover I lost all faith in Archie.
#55
Posted 08 March 2009 - 12:34 AM
I don't really see how SonAmy is logical for Archie? I mean, Archie is based on SatAM, and Amy wasn't really established in that comic until after Sonic and Sally were established as close friends at least, not to mention characters who have known each other since childhood. I haven't read all of the comic, but Amy, regardless of 'verse, has always struck me as having a crush...but not much more than that.
Not to start pairing debates or anything.
EDIT: I do wish that they would have been more creative with the kids, though. Their designs are so bland. :/
Agreed that this all about Sonic/Sally stuff, but the games are seeming to pushing Amy and Sonic closer together, and in the long run, what Sonic Team does out trumps Archie's story. Most of the only people who are hard core Son/Sally are the older fans, and the comics are made for kids, and the kids play the new games, and if Sonic and Amy become an item, then MXYL will have to change to Son/Amy.
Or Not! but it wouldn't hurt to see the Son/Amy future of it all. My main reasons for not liking the MXYL is just Sonic being tied down like that, and the fascination of Son/Sal is dead because we see what it's going to look like in the end. It ends up being more bureaucratic drama, and Sonic torn between wanting to running out and save the world and Sally telling him he needs to be in the kingdom. And I'm glad the boring child designs bother other people too. I mean, it'd be more interesting to see a brown Sonic with red hair and a blue Sally, or something more clever then clones. But they can't change it now, it was the mistake of someone else that the new writers have to deal with.
If what I'm seeing though is these MXYL focus around Knuckles' daughter, so it is possible that we'll be seeing little of Sonic's kids after this issue. This Shadow side story is still interesting so I'll be reading the books up until then.
#56
Posted 08 March 2009 - 12:56 AM
I don't really see how SonAmy is logical for Archie? I mean, Archie is based on SatAM, and Amy wasn't really established in that comic until after Sonic and Sally were established as close friends at least, not to mention characters who have known each other since childhood. I haven't read all of the comic, but Amy, regardless of 'verse, has always struck me as having a crush...but not much more than that.
Not to start pairing debates or anything.
EDIT: I do wish that they would have been more creative with the kids, though. Their designs are so bland. :/
Agreed that this all about Sonic/Sally stuff, but the games are seeming to pushing Amy and Sonic closer together, and in the long run, what Sonic Team does out trumps Archie's story. Most of the only people who are hard core Son/Sally are the older fans, and the comics are made for kids, and the kids play the new games, and if Sonic and Amy become an item, then MXYL will have to change to Son/Amy.
Or Not! but it wouldn't hurt to see the Son/Amy future of it all. My main reasons for not liking the MXYL is just Sonic being tied down like that, and the fascination of Son/Sal is dead because we see what it's going to look like in the end. It ends up being more bureaucratic drama, and Sonic torn between wanting to running out and save the world and Sally telling him he needs to be in the kingdom. And I'm glad the boring child designs bother other people too. I mean, it'd be more interesting to see a brown Sonic with red hair and a blue Sally, or something more clever then clones. But they can't change it now, it was the mistake of someone else that the new writers have to deal with.
If what I'm seeing though is these MXYL focus around Knuckles' daughter, so it is possible that we'll be seeing little of Sonic's kids after this issue. This Shadow side story is still interesting so I'll be reading the books up until then.
The MXYL stories are only a possible future. Not THE future.
In fact, that future's been invalidated already. Locke was shown to have died of cancer or something, but recent issues have shown different.
#57
Posted 08 March 2009 - 01:13 AM
The MXYL stories are only a possible future. Not THE future.
In fact, that future's been invalidated already. Locke was shown to have died of cancer or something, but recent issues have shown different.
Well see that's where the beef comes from. Besides obvious fan service, why do they keep going back to that future time line rather then just coming up with one of their own?
And when the issue comes out we're going to find out what is going on.
#58
Posted 08 March 2009 - 01:17 AM
TBH, I think fan service is the only reason. It's the same stuff that got Tommy killed off for good, and I bet it had something to do with the Echidna genocide.The MXYL stories are only a possible future. Not THE future.
In fact, that future's been invalidated already. Locke was shown to have died of cancer or something, but recent issues have shown different.
Well see that's where the beef comes from. Besides obvious fan service, why do they keep going back to that future time line rather then just coming up with one of their own?
And when the issue comes out we're going to find out what is going on.
#59
Posted 08 March 2009 - 01:18 AM
#60
Posted 08 March 2009 - 01:21 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











