Leaderboard

I wanna say something nice. All your favorite characters are getting into Smash.

I honestly forgot about this thread, but I don't think dumb YouTuber whose entire personality is hating a comic book writer needs more attention than they've already gotten. Locking. Removing the videos as well since they don't need the views lol

I have a church event later tomorrow a few hours after the Direct. Honestly, I'm gonna need the Father's help regardless of what happens after.

when I first heard this it felt like video games were ending

It would be fantastic if there was a continuous mode with all the games back to back. It would be totally over budget for a simple wide-screen collection I'm sure, but imagine streamlining the graphics for the mode in something like Mania style graphics. My personal dream would be to have a new Christmas Island Zone to begin the adventure and finally show where Sonic is from, an intro area showing his first encounter with Eggman, since Sonic 1 wasn't his first rodeo. Make some new transition scenes for the older games, and for in-between each game. *drools* Would love some Mania style animations too, either as advertising or in the game for pivotal points. I've destroyed the budget, but I'm not apologizing haha

No more DLC speculations No more Smash Bros. No more fake leaks No more Smash Bros. No more death threats No more Smash Bros. No more unrealistic expectations No more Smash Bros. No more Smash Bros. NO. MORE. SMASH BROS. I think gonna I'm gonna like this.

For me it's Sonic 1 for Genesis/Mega Drive. At first I didn't enjoy it much, yeah it was ok but Marble Zone, pushing rocks, waiting on moving platforms, being crushed under those blocks in Spring Yard, etc. Especially coming from the 8-Bit version that's way simpler, but has a more mario-like level design and feels completely different. Then, by playing it many years later, I realized that it's a great game, solid and well designed, and I started to apreciate it a lot more. The opposite happend with Sonic 2, I loved it as a kid (though I originally played it on emulator with savestates), now I quite dislike the game aside for a couple of things (Aquatic Ruins for the level design and to an extent Casino Night for the creativity/originality). Sonic 3 & Knuckles is probably the superior game of the classic trilogy, but since it's long and has many cinematic moments, bonus stages and blue sphere special stages (which I grew up bored of) breaking the pace, at the end I realized that Sonic 1 is the classic game which I enjoy replaying the most (both versions, Genesis and 8-Bit).

Most Kingdom Hearts fans are 16 year olds or 20somethings that made getting picked on for liking anime in high school their personality so I just kinda stay away from them personally

Neither does Amy Rose...

Really? Best design? Wow I disagree hard. I'm not really satisfied with the direction they went with, and Kit's design is far nicer IMO. I'm optimistic that the character will make me like the design but it is far from the best. I'd also argue designs like Shadow, Metal, or even Scourge utilized the "evil counterpart/clone" concept better too. Both are just based on Ashura. Scourge's crown was even meant to replicate the black spot on his face that Surge also has.

I cannot stand Dillin. He's deluded and insufferable. Anyways, there's plenty of things to criticize Flynn for. Right off the bat, Dillin is very nitpicky, whining about the comics being more like the games, which is something a lot of fans actually wanted. He also criticizes Tracey's artstyle, which has nothing to do with Flynn's writing, and Scourge's jacket getting flames of all things. His "proof" that Ian has no respect for the series is... Sonic laughing at Crocbot. He's also mad about Crocbot, Mecha, and Sir Connery getting killed off. Y'know, characters that nobody cared about. I stopped listening after this. I'm no writer myself, so it's hard for me to really criticize someone's writing, but like I said, Ian Flynn did make some choices that I know I didn't like, and I've seen plenty of others with similar complaints. But this really isn't it. Dillin has a history of being mad for the sake of being mad, so I'd take all his "criticisms" with a grain of salt.

Literally who?

1. If you want to discuss someone's opinion , it would be nice if you gave a link to that opinion. 2. I don't like format this guy picked, it's similar to "Cinema Sins", picking out every little thing, no matter how trivial or forced. It's not meaningful discussion, it's nitpicking. 3. But overall: yes, Flynn isn't perfect. Some decisions he made are controversial, especially during his early days. Sometimes he was just following orders from editors, we'll never know for sure which ones. Most broad criticism is that Flynn torched old Archie in order to mold it into his image. I do agree it wasn't the most tasteful way, but ultimately it was quickest way to get comics into better direction. I mean quality jump between 159 and 160 is so high, it's worth all the nitpick this guy has.