Jump to content

Wolfy

Retired Staff
  • Content Count

    7,897
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Reputation Activity

  1. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Skye in New Moderators   
    Ay, congrats to you all ❤️
  2. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Pawn in New Moderators   
    Ay, congrats to you all ❤️
  3. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from RedFox99 in No Sonic Adventure 3 (SA3) *OR* Sonic 06 topics please   
    Leaving this pinned as replacement to another topic that was held as an example of what not to make in regards to yet another dumb SA3 topic. Too often they pop up and they're usually the same things, as well as 'cause a lot of arguments and drama. So no Sonic Adventure 3 topics please. Thanks.
     
    If the title ever does arise, you can expect a staff member to handle it.




  4. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Mark1 in Console Wars The Movie "Sega Vs Nintendo, Made by Sony"   
    Can Nintendo and Sega both be personified and fight in giant mechs and shit, equipped with suiting weapon/move names like Mode 7 and Blast Processing? I mean a documentary is cool and all but
     
    I NEED IT, D;
  5. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from zephyrzaivian in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  6. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from FFWF in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  7. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Milo in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  8. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from AdventChild in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  9. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Pelvic WOO! engine in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  10. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Shiguy in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  11. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from PC the Hedgehog in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  12. Fist Bump
    Wolfy got a reaction from Sr101 in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  13. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Cola in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  14. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Gabz Girl in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  15. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Fletch in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  16. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Mark1 in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  17. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Detective Kaito in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  18. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from GuyWithThePie in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  19. Chuckle
    Wolfy got a reaction from Jar Jar Analysis 1138 in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  20. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Baconjack in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  21. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Zaysho in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  22. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Rummy in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  23. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from lbyrd2 in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  24. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from Monkey Destruction Switch in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
  25. Thumbs Up
    Wolfy got a reaction from MightyRay in Sonic Forces Reviews Thread   
    For those rubbing against the Polygon review score and those celebrating with it, I think it's just clear that a majority of people are not happy with the direction Forces has taken the series, and having a review clearly reflect on those frustrating issues is satisfying to hear. That said, I think there's plenty of evidence of bad level/game design, rigid controls, and other core elements that a day-one patch is not going to alleviate and buff a review score, I'm sorry. I think the real split is on the story direction and tone, and possibly just boost gameplay in general, and that's fine if it's your thing (or not whatever). However, I still think a majority of people are not into an edgier sonic plot (at least in this sense) and tire of the Unleashed/Gens gameplay, especially when the latter here seems to be the least polished we've seen of this gameplay style. Seeing a 5/10 is pretty justifiable I believe, though that doesn't mean it's impossible to enjoy for certain fans.
    Personally, I think the disappointment here is a lack of innovation in gameplay. I can swallow the weird story time traveling whatevers, miscellaneous cast like a giant jar of jellybeans, and other Sonic quirks, but when the core game manages to feel like a more stale version of something introduced 10 years ago and carried ever since, it's disheartening. It's drawing parallels to Sonic 4 and the original trilogy to me, whereas the game feels like a shallow husk of something we've had before, despite the shiny coat of paint. The avatar is hardly an innovation gameplay wise, at least as its executed in Forces anyway. What I'm mainly looking at is our actual hero Sonic, and if this game gains anything for the next Sonic game. The only thing I'm finding is proof that modern boost Sonic is an awfully stale roller coaster ride we've gone on too many times. Classic Sonic has well overstayed his welcome as a side gimmick, and I'm afraid the avatar will be a one trick pony that won't get the same wow-factor the next time around.
    Again that's my personal view on the game as it nears release, and probably the first core Sonic game I won't be picking up, at least not right away and possibly to experience a game I can moreover analyze more rather than simply enjoy it. While it'd be great for Sonic Team and Sega and everyone else involved to take 2017 as a crucial point to review where Sonic should go next, I'm skeptical. But to most fans (of games in general) it'll probably remain a marker in the franchise of an underdog story between a poorly received AAA title and a critically acclaimed official fangame.
    That all said, I really do sincerely hope everyone getting this game can find things they enjoy about it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

You must read and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy to continue using this website. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.