Jump to content

Scar

TSS Member
  • Content Count

    8,159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Scar last won the day on February 11 2012

Scar had the most liked content!

3 Followers

About Scar

  • Rank
    Forever Cynical

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Country
    England

Recent Profile Visitors

37,788 profile views
  1. I don't recall any recent Sonic games trying to make Sonic cutesy? So I don't really understand where this is even coming from. Yeah they've been taking the angle of more self-aware and cartoonish approach, but that isn't really the same as being cutesy. YMMV if you don't like Sonic being a somewhat unfunny Ryan Reynolds wannabe. But its not like any of the other interpretations of Sonic have had stunning characterisation. SA1 Sonic was basic as fuck and had honestly laughable dialogue. SA2 is better, but that isn't really saying much. Heroes through to 06 is such utter garbage that its not even worth thinking about to be brutally honest. Unleashed and SatBK are probably the best iteration of the semi-serious Sonic, but still brought a lot more self-awareness and levity to the party than the ridiculously edgy nonsense that came immediately before it. What ultimately matters is the quality though. If a genuinely talented writer came in and produced a Pixar quality story where Sonic and co were cutesy, it would still be better than literally every other Sonic story that has ever existed. I personally don't care which direction they take, though I certainly have preferences. All I want is genuine effort and passion put into producing something of quality, instead of half-assedly attempting to target some niche segment of the massively fractured fanbase. If its just really fucking good, it has a better chance of satisfying not just existing fans, but attracting more people to the games as well.
  2. They probably realised it wasn't gonna be received like Generations. That game was basically Generations, but worse in every conceivable metric. 4 years to make a game that is visually stagnant and mechanically worse than its direct predecessor. Just terrible.
  3. 100% done with Marvel. Endgame was a great film and a great place to end my interest in anything related to Marvel.
    I hate Disney.

    1. Tails spin

      Tails spin

      Can you please explain....

      I mean I respect your decision just wanted to know your reasons for it

    2. Rusty Spy

      Rusty Spy

      No, that's perfectly reasonable. I share the exact same sentiment.

    3. mayday2592

      mayday2592

      If anything i'm hyped. No one seriously expected the MCU to end with Endgame. Theres so much more to explore with there  a being an increased cosmic and multiversal focus.

    4. Scar

      Scar

      Cause most of their films are just so cookie-cutter. They're rolled off a production line with all the passion of a Cadbury's Dairy Milk chocolate bar. Yes, they're pretty good, but not that good. Its not worth me going to pay to see each of the 2-3 formulaic derivative movies they release every year. Plus, I can't be bothered to follow a massive cast of mediocre characters - and lets be honest the best character in the franchise was Tony Stark, and CapAm had the best produced action films in the series. They're gone now. Their arcs reached their logical conclusion and I loved how they ended. There is nothing and nobody left who I can say I care about. 

    5. mayday2592

      mayday2592

      I'd say there's loads of passion for the source material from both the Directors, Actors and Kevin Feige. do  Most  It's why such dedication was put into Endgame and Infinity War. And Mediocre characters? I cant really agree. Most of these guys are way complex and  likable compared to your usual action movie hero.

  4. If they're making a game, they've been awfully quiet. Frankly that's a good thing as Forces was hyped to shit and turned out to be a horrible embarrassment. Put your heads down and make a good fucking game. Also cancel the live action movie pls ty.
  5. I don't mind, as long as it has the minimum effort of Generations Classic Stages put into it. Those stages were absolutely popping with life and detail and it was wonderful. Personally wouldn't mind letting Taxman continue with his pseudo 32-bit 2D Sonic, but would actually really love for them to evolve it into like a hand-drawn sprite based 2D sidescroller. Something like Rayman Origins/Legends. Still broadly flat and 2D, but with beautiful high-res, handdrawn assets rather than the current 16/32-bit-style assets. Ultimately anything that isn't the pre-rendered garbage that Sonic 4 E1 was, is absolutely fine. But a 2D high-res sprite based evolution of Mania is ideal for 2D games imo.
  6. What have we seen of the next game to declare a change in Era? Nothing. Maybe Lost World might have marked that change, but Forces regressed back to a worse version of Generations/Unleashed's gameplay. So we're back to that again.
  7. TSR's soundtrack is gonna be sick.

  8. Remix is fucking sexy. Bingo Highway was an underrated track, but this adds so much more to it.
  9. In a word. No. The games are bad, because they're poorly conceived and poorly designed. There is no creativity. The maintain a baseline level of technical competence, and that's it. Mario games haven't ever been bad, despite being almost exclusively "Solo Mario". In fact, its equally bullshit to suggest that the mere existence of Sonic''s shitty friends is what led to the decline (aside from Shadow's game). Solo Sonic isn't to be blamed, and neither are his friends.
  10. That's a pretty bold assumption to make, considering I directly addressed my policy regarding characters later in my post. I want characters that regularly feature in the game, to bring interesting gameplay to the table. Theoretically, you could manufacture a "unique" gameplay for every single existing character. Ideally though you'd want it to mesh with an underlying gameplay philosophy that is central to the franchise, with alternate play styles supplementing (or contrasting if its well designed) that central design philosophy. I'm not opposed to other characters existing. They need to add something though. Are they interesting characters? Can they be interesting characters? How many characters do you need for a single story? How many characters are too many characters? If they can be done well, fine. Main point though, is gameplay. I don't know. If you can't come up with anything interesting to do with them in the first place, do they really need to exist? Aside from appealing to a certain subsection of fans? The more characters you shunt into a game in a meaningless bid to appeal to their particular fans and to keep them relevant, the more bloated the story gets. If you try to focus on just a few characters in the interest of keeping a tightly focused narrative, then the sidelined characters are just window dressing. They add nothing to the story and may as well not be there. Then there is the issue of fans of those sidelined characters being upset that they were present, but not involved. What then? If keeping these characters is essential then make tiers. Core cast, primary supporting cast, secondary supporting cast, fringe characters, or something. But they don't all need to be involved in every game, or indeed in any game at all. Let them stay in comic books or as merch. More to the point though, the fanbase of this franchise is so goddamn divided that no matter what Sonic Team,SEGA or whoever does, some subsection of fans will be displeased with the direction they choose to go, because it happens at the expense of what they like. Adventure fans have been crying for literally years about how classic fans got Sonic 4 and Mania and blah blah blah, and how Boost fans got Generations and Forces and blah blah blah. Before them, it was the classic fans who had seen their once beloved franchise fall down the shitter in the interests of an edgy black hedgehog with fucking guns. And they complained on the internet about how classic design philosophies had been abandoned. I'm fucking certain that if Sonic Team moves away from the boost, some boost fans will come out of the woodwork and start complaining about how they are disappointed they aren't getting another one of those games. Where does it stop? If anything is to be sacrificed at this point, its the interests of some subsections of fans. The question of this thread was "What are you willing to sacrifice to make Sonic popular again?" So. If it were up to me, I'd go for a clean slate. Culling the cast is just one aspect of this. An initial small group of characters say, Sonic, Tails, Knuckles, Amy and Eggman are much easier to develop and characterise properly, than a sprawling mess of 30 characters who have 30 fucking years of baggage associated with them. Fuck, even this "core cast" needs to probably be sat down and rewritten so they're not as shallow as they currently are. Sonic shouldn't just be the cocky, impatient asshole. Tails shouldn't just be the boy genius. Knuckles shouldn't just be a strong dumb fuck. Amy shouldn't just be the obligatory love interest/female character. Boom, for all the shit it gets, at least tried to do something interesting with them, even if I don't like the trend of Knuckles continually being a simpleton. They can also bring with them some unique gameplay that is both in keeping with a design philosophy, and yet sufficiently diversified to add some nice variety. If this is starting to get a little thin, then you can reintroduce old favourites, but with similarly retooled characters (and backstories if need be), and maybe introduce a few new characters that have been given proper consideration. I don't want more Silver' or Infinites. I know Shadow is basically far too popular to ever be retired as a character and admittedly, I even have a soft spot for him. To "reintroduce" him, I wouldn't even mind a complete and total atomic reconstruction of SA2 (but better in every way) to preserve, or improve his backstory. But this should all take time. Sonic games should be once every 4-5 years. The big budget 3D ones at least. If Whitehead wants to collab and make Mania-type games on the side for $15 a piece in between major releases, sure. If there are karting games, sports games or other spinoffs in between, fine. In fact, I'd be more than happy to relegate most of the side cast to appear in these all-stars type games. I've already talked at length in many other threads, about how I'd like Sonic Team to go away and approach the gameplay. In a nutshell - go look at the classics, what made them great, what was the essence of that design philosophy. Go look at Adventures, what was good, what was bad. Go look at boost, what was good, what was bad. Take all that in and try coming up with a brand new 3D gameplay paradigm that brings all that knowledge together. Take as much time as is needed.
  11. Sacrifice to make popular? The Sonic franchise, despite the eldritch abomination it has recently become, is still popular. Even utter garbage like Forces manages to sell well enough to make SEGA a pretty dime. So, there isn't anything I would say I'd sacrifice to make the franchise popular. There is however, plenty I would sacrifice to make the franchise good again. For starters, the cast. The cast needs to be culled in a serious way. If merchandise is so goddamn important relegate them to the side lines. But let's be honest. Characters like Silver, Sticks, Big, Cream, Charmy, Bark, Bean, Fang (even Shadow, Rouge and the like to be brutally honest) etc. don't add anything to a franchise. Personally, I would slowly phase them out of existence. Stop mentioning their names, stop making their merchandise, and wait for them to fade out from our memories. There needs to be rules for characters to remain relevant. First and foremost - do they as a character have anything that could be made into unique gameplay that fits with the franchise. Secondly, could they be a relevant/interesting supporting character? This one is tenuous at best for me even. Ideally, I'd like most frequently appearing characters to be playable in some form. If not immediately, at some point. Think: Sonic Mania Plus. Then there's the gameplay. I've talked at length about what I want them to do with that, so I can't be bothered to repeat myself.
  12. Honestly, that doesn't really matter too much, considering that the series is focused around its titular character. But Diogenes is right. Having useful, even powerful abilities has nothing to do with mental fortitude. Other characters such as Tails (who is supposedly 8 years old for mercy's sake) can and probably should have very useful abilities, but they shouldn't all have the same strength of will. When you have characters it is important that they are different. Put each of them in any given situation and each of them should react differently. Maybe if Knuckles or Sonic (or Shadow?????) were in Tails' position they'd have reacted differently. Knuckles might have felt the resolve to take the fight to Eggman, Sonic may have turned angry and vengeful at the potential loss of a close friend. Who knows Forces was not a good game, nor did it have a particularly well written plot, but in certain areas they tried with the story. That they tried is the important part, because it means they can try again and maybe do it better. The intent was correct, but the execution was off. Problems like Infinite being the most one-note edgelord ever created, and the entire existence of Classic Sonic and Original the Character (DNS) are a detriment, but the latter two are at least ones I imagine were forced upon the writers by the circumstance of having absolutely creatively bankrupt management.
  13. Much as the whole of Sonic 4 at large was a game to forget, I find myself hoping that Jun Senoue remixes/remasters Sky Fortress Act 2 and 3 (ideally into a single track). Stood out amongst all the other tracks in the game.

  14. To be honest, I actually prefer it to the one that's used since Sonic 3 and Knuckles (not that I dislike that level complete theme, its also great). Feels like its got a "Good job, we cleared the stage, but there's still a long way to go till the end" vibe going for it. It sounds cool. However, this might just be nostalgia.
  15. I mean at this point, it wouldn't be a remaster as Crash and Spyro and Ratchet were, as opposed to a complete and total reconstruction of the game at an atomic level. There is so much wrong with SA1. It'd have to basically take the shell of it, and totally rebuild it from scratch.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

You must read and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy to continue using this website. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.