Jump to content

Blue Wisp

TSS Member
  • Content Count

    15,490
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Blue Wisp last won the day on November 11 2010

Blue Wisp had the most liked content!

About Blue Wisp

  • Rank
    reeeeeeeee
  • Birthday 07/15/1997

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Country
    Argentina

Contact Methods

  • Discord
    Ariel#6130
  • Steam
    bluewisp
  • XBL
    BlueWispGG
  • NNID
    BlueWiispU

Recent Profile Visitors

490,557 profile views

Single Status Update

See all updates by Blue Wisp

  1. Imagenthe fuck

    How much money did Sony give Square Enix?

    1. Thigolf
    2. pppp

      pppp

      I don't get why people are so baffled. Exclusive deals like this have been in games since the 90s. Earthworm Jim had exclusive Sega content, The PS1 Mortal Kombat games had content not on the N64 versions, the Xbox 360 had exclusive Call of Duty stuff, this is all part of competition, companies trying to give us reasons to get their console.

    3. Thigolf

      Thigolf

      Doesn't make it less shitty, dude.

    4. Teoskaven

      Teoskaven

      I think he's wondering what has changed now for people to actually start complaining, because this has been the first major example i see for this case. Hell, only a few years ago everyone was a-ok with Ubisoft having Star Fox content for the Switch version of Starlink and no deal for the other versions.

    5. Blue Blood

      Blue Blood

      Not to mention that is one of the most egregious examples ever. If you're dismissing that just because "it's the way it's always been", you're being wilfully ignorant and dismissive.

    6. KHCast

      KHCast

      It was always shitty. It was shitty with star link, it was shitty with Sonic & sega all stars, and it’s shitty now.

      but good god, I hate that I was right in thinking there’d be more sectioned off in this game 

    7. Strickerx5

      Strickerx5

      Lol, fuck off Square and Sony

    8. Blue Blood

      Blue Blood

      @KHCast I forgot about that! I could accept Banjo/Avatars on 360 and Miis on Wii because of first party rights, but having several SEGA brands exclusive to PC was lame. Although IIRC it was a much later release and SEGA simply weren't interested in the going through the associated costs of updating all the other platforms.

    9. Teoskaven

      Teoskaven

      That and some of the added characters (2 from Total War, one from Company of Heroes and one from Football Manager) had more presence (if not complete) on the PC market. Although in that case it could be Sumo just got told the exclusitivity beforehand and decided to pick and choose themed racers.

    10. pppp

      pppp

      @Thigolf  Why is it shitty? So basically you're saying Nintendo is shitty for doing that Wii U exclusivity deal with SEGA a few years back. Are they also shitty for putting their games only on the Switch? In the entertainment industry if you have no exclusive content you're nothing dude, why would I spend money on something, be it a console, a streaming service or whatever if there's nothing it offeres that others don't ?

      Was SEGA shitty for not putting Sonic 2 on the SNES as well?

    11. KHCast

      KHCast

      @Blue Blood Even in those cases, it still was a case of devaluing the PlayStation version and charging the same amount for it. Still shitty even if it “makes sense” given the characters. Hell, having different content in the same game based on different consoles is still in itself a ridiculously dumb idea to me, since it essentially tries to FOMO us and make us feel bad for not getting the other “better” version(s)

       

      @pppp that’s a lotta false equivalences you’re making 

      “In the entertainment industry if you have no exclusive content you're nothing dude” 

      In the case of video games, that’s why first party exclusives are a thing 

      “Was SEGA shitty for not putting Sonic 2 on the SNES as well?”

       

      LOL WHAT? 

    12. Thigolf

      Thigolf

      If a rich as fuck company shoves money up the ass of another company to keep content from other platforms, it's shitty, yes.

      Especially if the former rich as fuck as company has plenty of studios and cash to make their own content anyway. Noone is mad that Sony made games are Sony platform exclusives. People are mad that Sony and Square gatekeep their third party shit. Sony gets sales. Square gets cash. The consumer gets NOTHING out of this, other than fucked over.

    13. Strickerx5

      Strickerx5

      Quote

      So basically you're saying Nintendo is shitty for doing that Wii U exclusivity deal with SEGA a few years back.

      Thinks back to how RoL literally had one leg in the grave coming out the gate as they had to port the game down from hardware they already had working builds for. Not to mention how the series in general had next to no footing tech wise this generation largely due to being stuck on that gen for another 3 years...

      ... I mean to be fair, it was largely Sega being stupid there too.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

You must read and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy to continue using this website. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.