Jump to content

Disonoid 3000

TSS Member
  • Content Count

    318
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Disonoid 3000

  1. Something about his weapon bothers me. It's like it's trying to look three dimensional, but failing. It looks like a sticker, or like it's not finished being colored in or something.
  2. Comic Sonia and Manic are totally different from cartoon Sonia and Manic, though, in both look and role. If anything, the names are more of a shout out to them. I'd consider it more of a roadblock that they were complete clones of Sonic and Sally, but if a goatee makes using Knuckles okay I'm sure a missing tooth and new shoes will make using Sonic okay.
  3. There's not really any reason to connect the two because of the cameo here. All it means is that Purple Guy was probably an employee at some point, and to go from "Employee --> Phone Guy" is relying on the completely baseless idea that the murderer is someone we know.
  4. If it is in there then my mistake, I'm trying to check but my computer's freaking out.
  5. If anything, releasing just an image that doesn't really show anything could be a good interest boost. If people are truly interested in this project, a single screen shot just hinting at stuff will just intrigue them and make them speculate. I don't think I've ever seen anyone look at, for instance, Five Nights at Freddy's teaser images and complained that they didn't fully encompass the experience. They just expressed a ton of interest and eagerness for the particular game the teaser was for to come out.
  6. He's been doing the whole "Add things, clear up very little, generally give the impression nothing's planned" thing since the second one. I kind of get not keeping continuity with the first game and introducing a bunch of new stuff with the second second, but after the whole thing blew up you'd think he'd bother to plan something, especially since him stopping at four despite clear fan demand implies he did have some sort of plan in mind Maybe he just decided to go more for shock value than actually piecing things together. "I COULD tie up loose ends from the previous two games...but it'd make so many more lets players make over exaggerated surprise faces if I shoved the killer in an animatronic."
  7. I remember when the first FNaF4 teaser came out and people were SO SURE Freddy was going to be the star again because he was the first thing shown. I see that line of thought worked well. :rolleyes:

  8. ...Good grief, I hope someone less obnoxious is given the demo soon.
  9. I am so totally utterly surprised. I dunno if it's entirely fair to blame Sandler for it, though. I don't like the guy as much as anyone, but IMDB lists some writers who should probably share the blame with him.
  10. Wait...what? They're using live action?
  11. Wow, that was absolutely gorgeous! I already feel myself starting to like the protagonists here. Just about the only thing I didn't particularly like here was that Arlo's voice seemed kind of unexpected and unfitting, but I'm sure it'll sound better when it's an actual line instead of him just shouting.
  12. Personally, I want to know if this game will have Phone Guy. I hope it does. Springtrap's kind of in this. Unless ghosts can dream, it can't really be Purple Guy we're playing as. Unless there's some other, unhinted at reason why he'd decide to single out a Golden Bonnie.
  13. Oh my gosh. They combined the annoyance of live action remakes with the annoyance of comic relief focused followup movies.
  14. I think the app is supposed to have the book on it. http://www.kenpenders.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=2527&start=25 And I think buried in his forum somewhere is a mention of having people voice act the thing on the app, but it's late and I don't want to go digging for it right now, so take that with a grain of salt.
  15. As far as we know, he has no current job, his wife is a lawyer and pays for everything. And Ken's already fairly good at sketching (before the forum got wiped we talked about some charity sketches he did of characters that weren't his, and aside from a very wonky looking Anna, they weren't bad). I think his problem is more ugly designing and terrible coloring and shading.
  16. So from the look of it FNaF4 is turning out to be partially a horror version of Toy Story.

  17. The whole premise confines them to the arcade, though. Unless I massively misunderstood everything. I don't think there's really anything to do with consoles or mobile games, anyway. Sure, you can do jokes, but if Disney just wants to joke around about crud I suggest they start a web comic. Eh, I'd rank it a Wreck-It Ralph sequel as equally unneeded as a Frozen sequel.
  18. I can't imagine what you're even doing in this. Why the hell are you sticking your head out of the door? Why are you moving around? Is there going to be some "Make it out of the house" or "Move to different room/position as yours is no longer safe" thing? Those are the only scenarios I can think of where not just hunkering down in your bed would be a good idea. And I take it the guesses of the animatronics (except I guess Springtrap) not actually being there are correct cause I can't imagine any other way worrying about them being in your closet would work (and since you can apparently check it I presume it's not a "You know he's in there the whole time, make sure he doesn't get out" type thing), plus "you THINK you see". Which...kind of sucks, I think. FNaF3 is the only one I think people are really justified in their "Just meaningless jumpscares" complaint because of the hallucination animatronics. I don't want that mechanic back. Happy to see full animations, that was something I was really hoping for. Edit: And yes, thank you Scott, we're back in an innocent looking place instead of a generic horror attraction.
  19. Bleh. I don't see any need for a Wreck-It Ralph sequel. Or any Disney sequel for that matter. I loved the first movie but I just can't work up excitement for this, it seems so utterly pointless.
  20. I was surprised at the sheer amount of merchandising and advertising Minions is getting, then I remembered it's made by the same studio that made the ridiculously heavily merchandised and advertised Lorax movie, and suddenly everything made sense. 

  21. I know I probably sound like I'm defending Penders too much lately...but thinking about it a bit, is it really fair to be against him reusing art? In books themselves, yeah, it'd be bad, but so far as promotional stuff goes, it doesn't seem that uncommon for that to be done, at least from what I've seen. Maybe there's this general thing against using it for comic related things I don't know about.
  22. Well, Fredbear's and Springtrap didn't exist at the same time (and I can't think of any way to make it so they did, though I'm sure if he's desperate he could somehow), so I'm guessing either one of those things is a misdirection (Fredbear's isn't actually the missing letters, this doesn't actually connect to Springtrap in anyway, etc.) or flashbacks.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

You must read and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy to continue using this website. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.