Jump to content
Awoo.

IDW's Sonic the Hedgehog - Megathread


Dejimon11

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, VEDJ-F said:

Iizuka's answer to where Elise was in an interview from last year was that she was still in the human world. The Eastern side acknowledges it too. 

The stupidest thing ever is this:

"We don't wanna make a chao garden in Sonic Heroes"

"But the fan want it, and will ask where is the chao garden to use the animals they saved from the robots"

"To avoid confusion, we will remove the animals from the robots! We wanna make sure they know there is no chao garden!"

Incompetency is not something new with Sonic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, FFWF said:

 (This is completely arbitrary now that Classic Sonic is a separate character, but that decision didn't make sense either so we can abandon the fiction that Sonic Team's ideas make sense.)

Meh that one doesn't really bother me. A time period becoming an alternate Timeline due to time travel is a pretty standard thing. See for example Future Trunks in Dragon Ball. Changing the past only shifted his future into an alternate reality.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, FFWF said:

I do actually agree with the premise that "two worlds" is not actually meant to be taken completely literally. 

[....]

What I think is actually the case is that Sonic Team wants to segregate two different interpretations of the franchise: Human-dominated, and anthro-dominated.  It's reasonable to suggest that these correspond to different audiences; or at the very least to different themes and aesthetics.  Sonic Team have decided that they don't want to have both depicted simultaneously, and that instead each game should follow and dedicate itself to one interpretation only, without worrying about the other.  It's a bit like how Mario and Bowser are sometimes bitter enemies, and sometimes they play sports or race together; they're different interpretations of the franchise and they aren't meant to interact (which is a large part of the reason why Daisy and Waluigi don't appear in mainline games). 

[.....]

You can't "world-build" with two worlds because it is literally an excuse to avoid world-building.  I strongly suspect that if Ian Flynn pitched a comic storyline which explicitly acknowledged two worlds and the portal, it would be rejected.

Wow, you worded it perfectly. 

Made me remember that was my initial thought right after the leak, even the Mario comparison. 

...and it's making me remember all the silly complaints about those type of games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The two worlds conundrum will always be an interesting one for as long as it persists in such an unclarified form to be sure. I think probably the worst part about it though is that it feels like it is an unnecessarily clumsy obstacle instead of a potentially tool that could really create some interesting and dynamic adventures and stories. As a result, we can never really have any cohesive world spanning adventures without them feeling disconnected issue to issue like it has been so far in IDW. And while focused epics like in the vein of S3&K can work using a singular location, with Flynn's writing style benefitting a more all encompassing approach I wonder if such local focused per story setups would be able to feel particularly engaging long enough despite it being the reasonable approach considering the franchise.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, didn’t Flynn mention he’d be demonstrating how the link between the worlds works? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I recall, Iizuka first said it in an interview in 2010 (who knows how long he considered a thing before.. allegedly Adventure?), but it only started really being talked about when it resurfaced in 2015. Ian said the Archie comic would have included that in the reboot had he known about it prior, but.. why on Earth would he not have known about it by 2013? Why didn't they tell him?

Maybe SEGA really doesn't consider it as literally as we think if they didn't care to mention it.

8 minutes ago, Miragnarok said:

Also, didn’t Flynn mention he’d be demonstrating how the link between the worlds works? 

He said:

Quote

 know I have my explanations, maybe I can work that into the IDW book down the line, but as I’ve said in previous interviews and stuff, my focus in the book initially is to just to hit the ground running, and later on we’ll explore the deeper lore and history and all that.

And:

Quote

And it really isn’t going to affect the book for the first year and probably not for the first three years if things go the way I think they will. Maybe we can get down the line and explore the idea of the two worlds in more depth, but the general feeling I get from people is that they don’t want me to. I’m in no rush to do so. 

 

  • Fist Bump 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SBR2 said:

Meh that one doesn't really bother me. A time period becoming an alternate Timeline due to time travel is a pretty standard thing. See for example Future Trunks in Dragon Ball. Changing the past only shifted his future into an alternate reality.

Except that's not what happened, is it?  In Generations, Classic Sonic was described consistently throughout as being from the past, and the game ends with Modern Sonic explicitly identifying Classic Sonic's future with his own past - "Enjoy your future, it's gonna be great!"  If Classic Sonic's timeline was going to branch off, Modern Sonic wouldn't know anything about his future.  Furthermore, if we accept the premise that any time-travel or knowledge of the future affects the past and creates a split timeline, then the very moment Modern and Classic met, Classic would already be from "another dimension" - and yet he is never described as such.

In Forces, Classic Sonic is described consistently throughout as being from a different dimension, without hesitation or question.  There's no reason to suppose that Modern Sonic and Tails would even know that Classic Sonic's timeline had become a separate one; and in fact even if Classic Sonic had branched off into a different timeline, the fact is that he would still be referred to as a past Sonic because he's visibly not advanced enough years to catch up with Modern Sonic in age, indicating that he'd still be from an earlier point in time in his corresponding timeline.  I don't know anything about Dragonball, but in a branching timeline situation, likewise anyone from a potential future would still be described as being from the future, if an alternate one; they wouldn't use the "dimension" terminology as if their worlds had no relation.  After all, by that logic, no time-traveller from the future would ever actually be from the determined future if their very presence was affecting the past.  See, in this case, Silver, who is always referred to as being from the future rather than from another dimension - which he should be, if we're taking the premise that all time-travel affects the past.  The treatment of Silver in the series proves that Classic Sonic is not from another timeline that splits off after Generations.

The Classic-Modern split has nothing to do with branching timelines; nor can anyone pretend that the series ever indicates as such.  Forces flat-out retcons Generations, indisputably.  And this change, at least, is one that the games themselves are entirely open and honest about - unlike two worlds, which they have never acknowledged, and probably never will.

  • Fist Bump 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Marco9966 said:

The stupidest thing ever is this:

"We don't wanna make a chao garden in Sonic Heroes"

"But the fan want it, and will ask where is the chao garden to use the animals they saved from the robots"

"To avoid confusion, we will remove the animals from the robots! We wanna make sure they know there is no chao garden!"

Incompetency is not something new with Sonic.

I don't think that's quite as big a deal or a contradiction compared to other things.

  • Thumbs Up 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ivo the Coldsteel said:

I've started to embrace the whole two worlds idea because I like the notion of Sonic being such an adventurer that one world isn't enough for him.

Huh. I kinda like that, as well.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a nice sentiment and honestly makes Blaze's world feel that much more wasted since Sonic going back to his world after Rush Adventure without going on countless more adventures is kind of out of character for the wandering adventurer that he is. Technically, even Secret Rings got that right with Sonic going on countless more adventures in the Arabian Nights before returning to his world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, FFWF said:

I do actually agree with the premise that "two worlds" is not actually meant to be taken completely literally.  Somebody should press Iizuka on the details sometime; I strongly suspect that he'll give as non-committal an answer as possible.

What I think is actually the case is that Sonic Team wants to segregate two different interpretations of the franchise: Human-dominated, and anthro-dominated.  It's reasonable to suggest that these correspond to different audiences; or at the very least to different themes and aesthetics.  Sonic Team have decided that they don't want to have both depicted simultaneously, and that instead each game should follow and dedicate itself to one interpretation only, without worrying about the other. 

Essentially.

7 hours ago, FFWF said:

It's a bit like how Mario and Bowser are sometimes bitter enemies, and sometimes they play sports or race together; they're different interpretations of the franchise and they aren't meant to interact (which is a large part of the reason why Daisy and Waluigi don't appear in mainline games). 

To be fair, Daisy debuted in a game that's primarily based off the main games' style. Plus she & for the most part Waluigi were created by different developers.

5 hours ago, Marco9966 said:

The stupidest thing ever is this:

"We don't wanna make a chao garden in Sonic Heroes"

"But the fan want it, and will ask where is the chao garden to use the animals they saved from the robots"

"To avoid confusion, we will remove the animals from the robots! We wanna make sure they know there is no chao garden!"

Incompetency is not something new with Sonic.

That still feels like an arbitrary thing to work around.

 

49 minutes ago, FFWF said:

Except that's not what happened, is it?  In Generations, Classic Sonic was described consistently throughout as being from the past, and the game ends with Modern Sonic explicitly identifying Classic Sonic's future with his own past - "Enjoy your future, it's gonna be great!"  If Classic Sonic's timeline was going to branch off, Modern Sonic wouldn't know anything about his future.  Furthermore, if we accept the premise that any time-travel or knowledge of the future affects the past and creates a split timeline, then the very moment Modern and Classic met, Classic would already be from "another dimension" - and yet he is never described as such.

In Forces, Classic Sonic is described consistently throughout as being from a different dimension, without hesitation or question.  There's no reason to suppose that Modern Sonic and Tails would even know that Classic Sonic's timeline had become a separate one; and in fact even if Classic Sonic had branched off into a different timeline, the fact is that he would still be referred to as a past Sonic because he's visibly not advanced enough years to catch up with Modern Sonic in age, indicating that he'd still be from an earlier point in time in his corresponding timeline.  I don't know anything about Dragonball, but in a branching timeline situation, likewise anyone from a potential future would still be described as being from the future, if an alternate one; they wouldn't use the "dimension" terminology as if their worlds had no relation.  After all, by that logic, no time-traveller from the future would ever actually be from the determined future if their very presence was affecting the past.  See, in this case, Silver, who is always referred to as being from the future rather than from another dimension - which he should be, if we're taking the premise that all time-travel affects the past.  The treatment of Silver in the series proves that Classic Sonic is not from another timeline that splits off after Generations.

The Classic-Modern split has nothing to do with branching timelines; nor can anyone pretend that the series ever indicates as such.  Forces flat-out retcons Generations, indisputably.  And this change, at least, is one that the games themselves are entirely open and honest about - unlike two worlds, which they have never acknowledged, and probably never will.

Two words: Phantom Ruby.

37 minutes ago, Sonic Fan J said:

It is a nice sentiment and honestly makes Blaze's world feel that much more wasted since Sonic going back to his world after Rush Adventure without going on countless more adventures is kind of out of character for the wandering adventurer that he is. Technically, even Secret Rings got that right with Sonic going on countless more adventures in the Arabian Nights before returning to his world.

They probably wanted to save all that for another game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the Phantom Ruby changed the timeline and altered everyone perceptions so they don't notice the changes to reality. Maybe the Phantom Ruby caused Two Worlds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Razule said:

Maybe the Phantom Ruby changed the timeline and altered everyone perceptions so they don't notice the changes to reality. Maybe the Phantom Ruby caused Two Worlds.

Essentially, for the most part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FFWF said:

Except that's not what happened, is it?  In Generations, Classic Sonic was described consistently throughout as being from the past, and the game ends with Modern Sonic explicitly identifying Classic Sonic's future with his own past - "Enjoy your future, it's gonna be great!"  If Classic Sonic's timeline was going to branch off, Modern Sonic wouldn't know anything about his future.  Furthermore, if we accept the premise that any time-travel or knowledge of the future affects the past and creates a split timeline, then the very moment Modern and Classic met, Classic would already be from "another dimension" - and yet he is never described as such.

In Forces, Classic Sonic is described consistently throughout as being from a different dimension, without hesitation or question.  There's no reason to suppose that Modern Sonic and Tails would even know that Classic Sonic's timeline had become a separate one; and in fact even if Classic Sonic had branched off into a different timeline, the fact is that he would still be referred to as a past Sonic because he's visibly not advanced enough years to catch up with Modern Sonic in age, indicating that he'd still be from an earlier point in time in his corresponding timeline.  I don't know anything about Dragonball, but in a branching timeline situation, likewise anyone from a potential future would still be described as being from the future, if an alternate one; they wouldn't use the "dimension" terminology as if their worlds had no relation.  After all, by that logic, no time-traveller from the future would ever actually be from the determined future if their very presence was affecting the past.  See, in this case, Silver, who is always referred to as being from the future rather than from another dimension - which he should be, if we're taking the premise that all time-travel affects the past.  The treatment of Silver in the series proves that Classic Sonic is not from another timeline that splits off after Generations.

The Classic-Modern split has nothing to do with branching timelines; nor can anyone pretend that the series ever indicates as such.  Forces flat-out retcons Generations, indisputably.  And this change, at least, is one that the games themselves are entirely open and honest about - unlike two worlds, which they have never acknowledged, and probably never will.

I agree with this, sort of .

If you want me to respond I can I had originally written a large response then accidentally deleted and now I don't feel like rewriting it but if you need clarification I will.

But you are wrong, or half right, it wasn't meant not to define the world it was meant to not define the animal parts of the world or animal world. And recently sega has found that defining that world may have value, so this is why the two worlds thing is coming up.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Shadowlax said:

But you are wrong, or half right, it wasn't meant not to define the world it was meant to not define the animal parts of the world or animal world. And recently sega has found that defining that world may have value, so this is why the two worlds thing is coming up.

 

Two worlds kinda seems like a way to not have to define a world. Especially if they never bring it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the two worlds thing feels primarily like a consecutive way for Sonic Team to just make new games without having to deal too much with what came before if they don't wanna include it in the story.

  • Thumbs Up 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Razule said:

Two worlds kinda seems like a way to not have to define a world. Especially if they never bring it up.

Unless it's literally like the Super Mario Bros. cartoon, having 2 worlds isn't that at all...

That's definitely the way it's being used, but it doesn't soley mean that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should have three worlds: Sonic's World, the human world, and the world where Sonic's Schoolhouse took place.

  • Nice Smile 1
  • Chuckle 2
  • Way Past Cool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Razule said:

Two worlds kinda seems like a way to not have to define a world. Especially if they never bring it up.

But they weren't defining it before.

Ok, so to go into the bit of the large post I accidentally deleted like an idiot. There's one thing I feel like a lot of you are forgetting, one element of the franchise that is key to all this, and i'm not mad at you forgetting. Because its speaks to how poor an idea it always was, and how terrible it was communicated every time, and how little impact it had.

Humans. Sonic's whole thing, or at least the thing they wanted sonic to be and it never worked out, is literally your friend. Your supposed to believe you could hang out with sonic, he could be right around the corner ready to wisk you away on cool adventures around the world. That's sort of the point, that is what sonic had been sold as for years, in games, anime, cartoons comics this has always been a consistent part of his character. Animal world didn't need to be defined, or even separated because it didn't matter. Its not what they saw sonic and friends are, they are supposed to make your lives better. The character with the most complicated backstory has his backstory seeped in humanland shit for that reason. They want sonic and friends to relate directly to you. They defined the world and made it in some many ways similar to ours because of it, it has structure, government history and lore that does not exist in a lot of the animal parts of the world, or animal world. Because you aren't supposed to think about animal world, sonic is supposed to be your cool friend, don't worry about that.

The issue is, it never worked. When they first tried to give sonic a human girlfriend, denied. Chris in sonic X? Even as a kid me and a lot of people I knew never liked chris or his friends, and didn't care about the humans except for like , topaz. Maria and Gerald die, and the only reason maria gets remembered is that she's a plot device for shadow, Gun general , Literally who? Elise? Litterally one of the most embarrassing moments in the entirety of the franchise and memed to this day. The only one of any note besides eggman is pickle. It never worked and it feels like the fanbase were more focused on making their own characters and living in sonic's world rather than having him and his friends come into their own.

And I think Sega finally came to terms with this, or realized this because they were so incompetent they just missed what their fanbase actually liked... or a weird combination of both about... around colors. This is when definitive changes about how sonic is presented and who he's around came up. Classic sonic comes back, other characters come back . More focus on explore weird shit that exists in sonic's universe.

And then you have like sonic boom, which I will say again is more indicative of what they want to do with the 3d part of this franchise than a lot of people want to admit. Its a whole new world, filled with animal characters, was going to have a chao world, had its own world and lore and was planned to be expanded upon. But that failed, but Sonic forces seems to picking up right where it left off in many respects. Sonic forces in its level design gives more world building to sonic's world that ... since like... sonic and knuckles. It confirms other animal people exist... and live places and have desires. I fully believe , unless i'm wrong , this will be the focus going forward doing stuff in sonic's world.

The two worlds thing isn't a means to not define a world. Its a means to quite literally push the human world out of the way so they can define the animal one.

Now some of you all might be like " Wow your hypothetical requires the belief that sega is so incompetent that they thought that being the cool animal characters wasn't the reason people liked this franchise with cool animals" , yes. I'm that cynical of them

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just read Team Sonic Racing comic (not written by Flynn), the story is not bad, but the banter is way below what Flynn does and reminds me of Pontaff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Marco9966 said:

I just read Team Sonic Racing comic (not written by Flynn), the story is not bad, but the banter is way below what Flynn does and reminds me of Pontaff.

Given how people feel about Pontaff that sounds like a bad thing

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Dejimon11 said:

Given how people feel about Pontaff that sounds like a bad thing

I'll give you the bad (cringey) lines, and the lines that are better to objectively evaluate:

Bad lines:

Spoiler

Eggman: I'm the coolest and I'll prove it in my sweet ride!

Eggman: What? You are so close already? I cheated so awesomely!

Big: Teamwork? I'd rather teamfish (not sure if this one is good or bad)

Chao: Teamwork makes the dream work!

Sonic: Time to leave you in my shadow, Shadow!

Good lines:

Spoiler

Omega: Bring-the-pains protocol initiated

Eggman: I hate that hedgehog!

Flynn is objectively better, believe me we should be happy that Flynn is handling the man book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on guys,  we can't judge on a first issue. I'm sure next follow-up would be much better sarcasm. I;m being super-hyper sarcastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Marco9966 said:

 

Bad lines:

  Hide contents

Eggman: I'm the coolest and I'll prove it in my sweet ride!

 

 

Okay, that one's actually funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

You must read and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy to continue using this website. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.