Jump to content
Awoo.

The Classic/Modern Character Embargo


Dr. Mechano

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Dr. Mechano said:

60 levels?

I guess... if you really stretch the definition of "level," you could get 60 by taking the...

  • Number of zones: 7
  • Multiply that by 2 for each zone's first and second acts (boss acts will be handled separately for reasons I'll explain). So 7 x 2 = 14 so far.
  • Multiply those 14 by the 4 possible time periods in each stage (past, present, good future, and bad future). 14 x 4 = 56
  • Now take the 7 Act 3 stages for each zone and multiply that by 2 for the good and bad future variant of each (boss stages don't have past or present variations which is why they're handled separately); 7*2 = 14
  • Add the 14 possible boss stages to the 56 possible stage acts: 56+14 = 70 stages, I guess. 

Still somewhat misleading advertising.

They appear to have arrived at the figure of 63 levels by multiplying seven zones of three acts each by three time periods...  As you point out, this actually undershoots the true figure of 70 level( layout)s by forgetting that there are two iterations of each future (though boss acts have only futures).  I agree that the level count is overegging the pudding regardless, but they do explain their logic, and broadly speaking it's not wrong.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Salamander said:

They appear to have arrived at the figure of 63 levels by multiplying seven zones of three acts each by three time periods...  As you point out, this actually undershoots the true figure of 70 level( layout)s by forgetting that there are two iterations of each future (though boss acts have only futures).  I agree that the level count is overegging the pudding regardless, but they do explain their logic, and broadly speaking it's not wrong.

Yeah. It's "literally true but still misleading," which I guess is marketing hype 101.

Though yeah, I didn't notice the small-print explanation of their reasoning until you pointed it out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean it would be stellar marketing in the 90s much like “x hours of content” is used for games today...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

You must read and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy to continue using this website. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.